Skip to main content

Is Manmohan Singh a person of Integrity?

"Virtuous motives, trammelled by inertia and timidity are no match for armed and resolute wickedness."- Winston Churchill.

Among the reports that are even critical of Manmohan Singh, there is always a mention of his personal integrity and honesty. The picture presented is that of an honest man thrown into an impossibly corrupted environment.

Let me present the following scenarios…

#1 :A bank is being looted by some robbers. The security person is fully equipped with a gun and has the potential to avert the situation. But far from attempting to avert it, he looks the other way when the robbery takes place. Did he personally indulge in robbing? No. Is the person of good character otherwise? Possibly, yes. But would you call him a person of integrity? I doubt.

#2: You ask help from two of your friends. One person openly states his inability to help and moves out. The other person talks politely and lets you feel important while promising help. You take certain decisions based on the promised help. And yet at the opportune time, this person simply vanishes from sight. Of the two, who was rude? Who was polite? Whose action would you come to appreciate in long term?

#3 : A tribe is threatened by neighboring community. The leader has to make choice and take some hard decisions to protect his tribe. Yet, this man procrastinates and doesn’t take a decision. Due to his inaction, his tribe is wiped out. Was the leader a good person? Again, possibly yes. Did he ever hurt his own people? Possibly, no. Yet, will this leader be revered?

Naiveté in an individual is permissible, but criminal on part of a leader as their decisions would influence the masses. Inaction on part of individual only influences his own life and perhaps his own circle. Inaction on part of a leader is deadly poison that spreads across the whole community and renders them vulnerable to multiple assaults.

Let me elaborate. Nehru is no doubt one among the finest leaders that India could produce. With all his influence he could easily have become a dictator, yet he chose the tedious democratic process to get things done. Yet, we have come to criticize his short-sighted policies that many argue threw India into poverty. But most of his critics would not question his patriotism or honesty of intention. His intention was no doubt noble, yet when he failed, it wasn’t just a person who failed, it was a nation that faced the circumstances.

The will of one leader, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, made the dream of united India (ofcourse that's after partition though) possible and made a difference to millions under the oppressive rule of monarchs in princely states.

With power comes responsibility and it could have been better if Manmohan like Indiri Gandhi merely parrots "Corruption is global phenomenon" instead of making fools of people by staking his so-called personal integrity to protect his colleagues.

I can understand if a middle-class person refuses to fight back corruption and complies to get things done. What I cannot understand is that with powers invested unto him as Prime Minister of India, how he can fail to check the loot of this country by his team.

Considering that he is perfectly nice person (again this is not considered so by many..Please read this article - Manmohan Singh chronology) Contrary to what Manmohan thinks, integrity also involves owning mistakes. When he hints at his personal non-involvement in many of these scams, what he forgets is that as PM its his duty to be informed of all this. If he is not aware of these, then he doesn’t deserve to be in that powerful position.

And if he is aware of these, isn’t he an accomplice in the game which’s also a crime? Isn't he more dangerous than an openly corrupt person?


  1. Sonia, who conceals the fact that she is a christian; who doesn't want to give up her Italy citizenship; Is the one who rules the country; Ofcourse, known is the fact that Mr. Manmohan is only dancing to the tunes of Sonia. But, the end point is that a person who supports corruption is also corrupt.

    Reference to my blog (On a similar note):


Post a Comment

All-time Hits

The Controversial Caste System of Hinduism

Imagine concepts like feudal system, slavery, capitalistic exploitation and anti-Semitism being used to define the core of Christianity! Christians will be outraged at this inappropriate mixing of the core universal values of Christians and societal & historical aspects which merely existed in a Christian world.
Now this raises the question – why is caste system defined as the core of Hinduism? Especially as “caste” itself is a western construct. Sounds irrelevant?
Okay. Now imagine concepts like slave-trade, war on infidels, brutal subjugation of masses, temple destruction, and forceful conversions marking the core of Islam.
It is considered sensible to first understand what the core scriptures speak about the religion and its universal values. The ills of the community & its societal aspects are differentiated from its core philosophy.
Now, this brings us to the most interesting question – why is Caste System (caste based on birth) propagated to be the defining feature of Hindu…

Chetan Bhagat : His Literary Style and Criticism

Chetan Bhagat’s (CB) recent column created a furore, chiefly because of his audacity to speak for Muslim community and what many people conflate with his support for Narendra Modi’s Prime Ministerial ambitions.  
But what interested me most - and what this post would focus on - is questioning of his literary merit (or lack of it). Many journalists ridicule CB’s style of writing and his oversimplistic portrayals of characters sans nuance or sophistication. But I suspect this has more to do with the fact that his readers alone far outnumber the combined readers of many journalists - a point that many don’t appear capable of digesting.
No takers for layman’s language!
When Tulsidas rewrote Ramayana in Avadhi (a local contemporary dialect then), many conservative sections of society came down heavily upon him for defiling the sanctity of a much revered epic (originally written in Sanskrit). When Quran was first translated in Urdu (by Shah Abdul Qadir in 1798), it faced intense opposition by …

The concept of Dharma in Ramayana

The concept of Dharma is not adequately understood by Hindus themselves, not to mention others. Dharma is not a set of do’s and don’t’s or a simplistic evaluation of good and bad. It requires considerable intellectual exertion to even begin understanding Dharma, let alone mastering its use.

Is Dharma Translatable?
Few words of a language cannot be faithfully translated into another without injuring its meaning, context & spirit. English translations of Dharma are blurred and yield words like religion, sense of righteousness, discrimination between good and bad, morals and ethics or that which is lawful. All these fall short of fully grasping the essence of Dharma.
Every language has an ecosystem of words, categories and grammar which allow a user to stitch words together to maximum effect such that meaning permeates the text without necessarily being explicitly explained at each point. Sanskrit words such dharma, karma, sloka, mantra, guru etc., now incorporated in English, lose thei…

Trending Now