Can
the flame of faith sustain the storm of helplessly witnessing one’s God’s idol
smashed to pieces? Will an ideologue who witnesses the entire edifice of her
perspective crumble under the weight of truth revert or revolt?
AAVARANA
as Bhyrappa explains in the preface is an act of concealing truth. And our intensely
ideological, middle-aged protagonist experiences a catharsis of sorts when
confronted with truth, a truth that shines through the pervasive deception if only
one looks for it.
Plot
Razia,
an ex-Hindu who converted to marry her Muslim college-mate, has an
‘enlightened’ view of history, thanks to the ‘progressive’ arts course at the
film-institute she and her husband Amir have been through. She finds her father’s
fierce opposition to her marriage with Amir dogmatic. Aren’t all religions
equally regressive and fit to be thrown into the dustbin of history?
Surprisingly, despite the Marxist bent of both Amir and Lakshmi’s mind, Amir
insists on her conversion to Islam. The stalemate is resolved when their
professor Sastri intervenes and persuades Lakshmi to convert in the larger
interests of the great progressive movement.
When
Lakshmi’s father cuts off all ties with her and refuses to admit her very
existence, she comes to hate her ancestral religion with greater vigour. That
even her father, a Gandhian known for his social service and efforts to uplift
downtrodden, cannot overcome his ‘bias’ is proof that his religion is at fault,
she reasons. Though alive for 28 years since, they’re destined to never meet in
flesh.
Presently,
the celebrity couple are tasked with filming a government-sponsored documentary
on (the ruins of) Hampi which brings the hitherto concealed and twisted facts
to light. What remains of the famed city of great prosperity and rich
architecture today? Mutilated sculptures, destroyed temples and the complete
ruin of an entire civilization! It is said, that the invaders spent six months
to raze it to ground. What meets our eyes today is but a caricature of
once-glorious past. She recalls her father’s parting words, “…someone in some future generation that you
both will give birth to will someday destroy our temples”. Was her father
right after all?
Wisdom
is a partial victory of age over youth. News of her father’s death reaches
Razia and blood being thicker she drops her film-making efforts to visit her
native village. Apparently, her father devoted the last few years in deep,
rigourous study of history and had been making notes towards preparing a book. Shaken
by his books and notes, Razia whose historical understanding was entirely
informed by ideological pamphlets and sloganeering, begins to probe further.
Her father refers to the original sources and quotes directly from them,
something that hadn’t occurred to her despite being a professional.
In
an endevour to bring to life the dull monotony of historical facts, Razia
stitches them together through a fictional novel (a better exemplar of
story-within-story concept will be hard to find). It begins with the
earth-shattering destruction of one’s world and worldview; an overpowered
Rajput prince sees his men slaughtered by Aurangzeb’s army, hears the cries of
their women committing jauhar and sees his Kingdom’s chief diety Lord Vishnu’s
idol being broken to pieces. Mentally, his manhood was broken, then and there;
though it is also literally broken sometime later.
Welcome
to the reality of medieval India where victorious Muslims kings attacked
commoners, killed the adult males, and took the young and women as their
slaves. These slaves were sold in foreign markets too; the Hindu Kush mountain
range in present-day Afghanistan owes its name to the large number of deaths of
these ‘Hindu’ slaves while transporting them through its difficult climate and
terrains to foreign lands. The women from captured territory were distributed
as spoils of war and traded between the victorious like merchandise; they had
no say over these transactions. Young men were used like ‘women’ by many such sublords;
oh yes, the homosexual (and bisexual) orientation of Muslim ruler-caste is a
closely-guarded secret, but a grim reality nonetheless. Our prince is forcefully
converted to Islam, castrated (replete with painful depiction of the process),
and sold off (as high-worth eunuch) to guard harems of ruler-caste. Does he
recover his strength and regain a purpose, a meaning of life?
History of negationism
Obviously,
there are many layers and characters that are left untouched above. But AAVARANA
questions the motives of ‘eminent historians’ in forcefully twisting history to
suit their Marxist theory instead of letting facts speak for themselves. What
is the motive of history-telling? Telling truth, whatever it means, wherever it
takes us, avers Bhyrappa. Even an artist has the duty to choose truth over
beauty, if and when such a dilemma presents itself. Indian historians are thus
guilty of negationism. They actively deny, twist or re-frame the facts to fit
their ideological template while ignoring facets that stand distinctly out from
their narrative.
There
has been criticism questioning Bhyrappa’s motive in digging the unpleasant past
which might give a fillip to the rise of Hindu nationalism and encourage the
‘tyranny of the majority’. Of course, any theory or philosophy can be
appropriated. But does that reduce the efficacy of the truth by any measure? For
instance, does the fact that a string operation that caught a minister
red-handed is politically-motivated make him innocent?
Despite
the “terrorists have no religion” sloganeering by leftists, the propaganda develops
cracks when commoners observe that coincidentally most terrorists belong to one
particular religion. Indeed, the temple-breaking proclination of medieval invaders
is forcefully attributed to ‘economic’ reasons (the loot from the temple’s
riches) whereas the invaders themselves honestly proclaimed their intention to
destroy temples as a part of their religious duty and gleefully noted the havoc
they wrecked on the holy sites of Hindus. The more sacred the temple, the more
motivated the invaders were in destroying it to humiliate the kaffirs and
demonstrate their religion’s supremacy over theirs. As Koenraad Elst pointed
somewhere, if India were a Muslim-majority nation, Babri Masjid would become
the national monument showcasing the victory of one-true-religion over
infidels. This was a systematic activity carried out by every pious Muslim king
(with an exception of Akbar who earned the ire of traditionalists for this
reason), and can be traced to the very origin of Islam in Arabia.
Indeed,
Sita Ram Goel’s “Hindu Temples - What happened to them” which produces a list of temples that were destroyed to make way
for Islamic structures was met with stony silence by the very same ‘eminent
historians’ who attack Hindus for questioning their stranglehold in
history-telling. These historians for once had an excellent opportunity to
permanently dislodge ‘Hindu nationalism’ by debunking his technically falsifiable
thesis. Yet, apart from the standard
dust raising fare of allegations of Hindu chauvinist trying to ignite communal
strife, little was done by way of refuting his actual thesis by proving that
the mentioned Islamic structures were not built on Hindu ones. In fact, these
historians are rendering great disservice to the nation by aggravating communal
imbalance by unabated appeasement of certain communities and ruthless attack on
the better-deserving majority.
Dharma vs. religion
If
Hindus were indeed spiritually mature, why did they face defeat after defeat? As one who pondered
over this question often, the book has some answers. Does the failure of Hindu
kings to defeat the invaders reflect unfavourably on their spiritual
underpinnings? Do the continuous victories of Muslim kings imply their
religious superiority? Razia (rather Bhyrappa) chooses a sadhu in Varanasi to
voice the wisdom of Sanatana Dharma to enlighten the prince, “We create our gods based on which stage
development we are with respect to ethics, morals and spirituality. Worshipping
only one god also means that you worship the god I ask you to worship. …true
spirituality doesn’t need God.” That’s the gist, but it goes on and
explains the nuances of Dharmic battles very well. Commoners were seldom
touched after battles, and the children and women of defeated kingdom were
treated with respect and let off to lead a life of their own.
Bhyrappa
takes a more nuanced approach to history when he makes Razia speak at a
conference where she unambiguously states that present-day Muslims in no way
are responsible for what their ancestors did. As a matter of fact, many Indian
Muslims were born-Hindus who converted to Islam. They’re the primary victims of
forceful conversion than the aggressors themselves. However, the key to stop identifying
with such a legacy. None hold present-day Germans responsible for Nazi
atrocities because they’ve strongly dissociated themselves with the past,
condemned it and have moved on.
The
book closes with a very pertinent quote by Swami Vivekananda about the danger
of an untrained yogi stumbling upon the superconscious state [full quote here].
Used as we are to seeing Hinduism
dissected through Abrahamic lenses, it is insightful to observe as to what the
reverse yields. Sentimentalism has long blunted the Hindu intellect, and it is
time for purva paksha, an ancient dharmic technique (restored to currency by
Rajiv Malhotra) where a debater must first authentically understand in the
opponent’s perspective, test the merits of that point of view and only then
engage in debate using his own position. If only Hindus were to fully read the
Abrahamic books in their own context and perspective, many myths would
readily have been dispelled.
A
word about the English translation by Sandeep Balakrishna - I’ve acknowledged him among my influencers who enabled me to be an informed, unapologetic Hindu
and unveiled the ‘truth’, long before AAVARANA (originally written in Kannada)
was translated to English. He does a yeomen service in encapsulating the spirit
of the book without letting his artistic sophistry outshine its essence.
One of the best books I have read. I liked Rasia's lecture in the conference.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.facebook.com/AuthorHariharan/