Skip to main content

The Obama legacy on race

Even those not particular about following political speeches were moved to tears listening to the now famous Yes, we can!” victory speech by Barack Obama in 2008.  I remember having printed copies of the speech and distributing them to my study-circle.  

US had come a long way since abolition of slavery, since Martin Luther King’s civil rights movement and the final nail on the racial coffin was the election of a black to the topmost position in the nation. Since, any further criticism on the continuing poor treatment of blacks is rebuffed with: “How can you talk about racism any longer, when a black man is the president, the most powerful human being on earth?”  At least this is how legitimate concerns about the enduring racial discrimination are papered down, feels author Richard Crasta.

In his latest offering The Many Faces of Barack Obama and Race in America: An Immigrant's View the author of the path-breaking Impressing the Whites: The New International Slavery, reviews the legacy of Obama with specific reference to race.  Race continues to be of paramount importance to blacks; blacks are more likely to be randomly questioned by police, more likely to lose life if they behave too suspiciously and more likely to be found in jails (disproportionately higher than their population-share).  In this context, it must be seen if Obama’s presidentship improved blacks’ status in the society.

Crasta quotes Joe Biden’s description of him in 2007: "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and “clean” and a nice-looking guy, I mean, that's a storybook, man" (emphasis supplied). Crasta emphasizes how “clean” part was instrumental in his elevation: first as a potential candidate and later as the President. Essentially, what distinguished him from other blacks is precisely this: that he appeared closer to the dominant whites in consciousness, than to other blacks. Indeed, he had to repeatedly impress upon the US audience that his middle-name “Hussein” was only an appendage and that he was a practicing Christian. To think that his personal faith is a matter of public interest in a supposedly secular state, and that this doubt persists despite the fact that his administration continued the war against the ‘axis of evil’ (which, coincidentally, happen to be Muslim nations)!

In the preface, Crasta notes that he considered alternative titles, of which one is most telling: “Playing by Their Rules? The Dilemmas of a Black President and a Brown Writer”.  Crasta feels that in his endeavor to be seen as non-partisan (read lacking black consciousness) , Obama had been playing by their rules and impressing the whites. What makes this book unique is that they record author’s feelings at various moments of writing, extending from his rise, victory speech day, and during his tenure. Did his regime signal the end of discriminative practices to those millions of unprivileged blacks? Crasta gets tantalizingly close to the harsh truth elsewhere: “..but for his (Obama's) present fame .. anyone else looking like him, and wearing scruffier clothes, would run into trouble walking around in a white American neighborhood.

As a brown immigrant, Crasta offered his views on the neocolonialism in "Impressing the Whites", and he asks pertinent questions about media's obsession with trivia regarding celebrities while relegating more serious issues of human interest (of colored people) to background. He thus empathizes with Obama's dilemma, having faced similar situations, though as a lesser known individual. Its unfortunate that color should matter to anyone, but as long as color remains an ineradicable part of colored people's life and influences how they're treated,  it shouldn't be pushed into over-simplistic black or white zones, and must be be discussed with the nuance it deserves.

Yes, he tried!”, but he fell short of accomplishing what the millions who voted him hoped he would. Personally, what strikes me as particularly ominous is that the pendulum of racial balance swung back with vengeance. Donald Trump, with his Orwellian-sounding “Make American Great Again” slogan, seems to have captured the imagination of many whites (in passing, why does he think America ceased to be great?). Bernie Sanders, however, does have the admiration of the author, who unburdened with “impressing the whites” agenda, might be able to enforce lasting change to the dispossessed poor, of whom blacks constitute a majority.

Appreciative, but not uncritical! Read a deeply compassionate, yet objective account of Obama's legacy: The Many Faces of Barack Obama and Race in America: An Immigrant's View


All-time Hits

The Controversial Caste System of Hinduism

Imagine concepts like feudal system, slavery, capitalistic exploitation and anti-Semitism being used to define the core of Christianity! Christians will be outraged at this inappropriate mixing of the core universal values of Christians and societal & historical aspects which merely existed in a Christian world.
Now this raises the question – why is caste system defined as the core of Hinduism? Especially as “caste” itself is a western construct. Sounds irrelevant?
Okay. Now imagine concepts like slave-trade, war on infidels, brutal subjugation of masses, temple destruction, and forceful conversions marking the core of Islam.
It is considered sensible to first understand what the core scriptures speak about the religion and its universal values. The ills of the community & its societal aspects are differentiated from its core philosophy.
Now, this brings us to the most interesting question – why is Caste System (caste based on birth) propagated to be the defining feature of Hindu…

Chetan Bhagat : His Literary Style and Criticism

Chetan Bhagat’s (CB) recent column created a furore, chiefly because of his audacity to speak for Muslim community and what many people conflate with his support for Narendra Modi’s Prime Ministerial ambitions.  
But what interested me most - and what this post would focus on - is questioning of his literary merit (or lack of it). Many journalists ridicule CB’s style of writing and his oversimplistic portrayals of characters sans nuance or sophistication. But I suspect this has more to do with the fact that his readers alone far outnumber the combined readers of many journalists - a point that many don’t appear capable of digesting.
No takers for layman’s language!
When Tulsidas rewrote Ramayana in Avadhi (a local contemporary dialect then), many conservative sections of society came down heavily upon him for defiling the sanctity of a much revered epic (originally written in Sanskrit). When Quran was first translated in Urdu (by Shah Abdul Qadir in 1798), it faced intense opposition by …

The concept of Dharma in Ramayana

The concept of Dharma is not adequately understood by Hindus themselves, not to mention others. Dharma is not a set of do’s and don’t’s or a simplistic evaluation of good and bad. It requires considerable intellectual exertion to even begin understanding Dharma, let alone mastering its use.

Is Dharma Translatable?
Few words of a language cannot be faithfully translated into another without injuring its meaning, context & spirit. English translations of Dharma are blurred and yield words like religion, sense of righteousness, discrimination between good and bad, morals and ethics or that which is lawful. All these fall short of fully grasping the essence of Dharma.
Every language has an ecosystem of words, categories and grammar which allow a user to stitch words together to maximum effect such that meaning permeates the text without necessarily being explicitly explained at each point. Sanskrit words such dharma, karma, sloka, mantra, guru etc., now incorporated in English, lose thei…

Trending Now